Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Leyline | ocaroca | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | ander_lizarrakoa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | bluelips | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | ander_lizarrakoa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | popeville | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Domain Zur Overlords , Golgari Obliterator , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Leyline , Sultai Beanstalk
Meta Performance Analysis
Heritage Reclamation ranks #135 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 40%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 49.1%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Heritage Reclamation is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 15.71 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.7%. Heritage Reclamation has a win rate of 71.8%, making it 3.1% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Heritage Reclamation than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sentinel of the Nameless City | Creature — Merfolk Warrior Scout | 3 | 5 | 100.0% | 69.7% | +30.3% |
| Innkeeper's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 2 | 6 | 91.9% | 71.8% | +20.1% |
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 88.9% | 69.0% | +19.9% |
| Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 1 | 6 | 90.6% | 70.8% | +19.8% |
| Emberheart Challenger | Creature — Mouse Warrior | 2 | 6 | 90.6% | 70.8% | +19.8% |
| Questing Druid | Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 6 | 91.9% | 72.4% | +19.4% |
| Monstrous Rage | Instant | 1 | 6 | 90.6% | 71.7% | +18.9% |
| Hired Claw | Creature — Lizard Mercenary | 1 | 5 | 88.9% | 70.2% | +18.7% |
| Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 2 | 5 | 88.9% | 70.8% | +18.1% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 6 | 80.6% | 71.8% | +8.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 5 | 0.4% | 52.9% |
| Gruul Aggro | 5 | 0.2% | 91.4% |
| 1 | 2.1% | 25.0% | |
| Abzan Midrange | 1 | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Abzan Pixie | 1 | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.